What would you like to find today?

The Background on ADHD Treatments, rTMS and tDCS:

Methylphenidate is known as the gold-standard treatment for ADHD, increasing dopamine concentrations and helping to focus. However, these psychostimulants may be less well-tolerated in adults. Adverse effects include decreased appetite, nausea, racing heartbeat, restlessness, nervousness, and insomnia. 

Neurofeedback is a non-pharmaceutical treatment that combines cognitive behavioral therapy techniques like conditioning and positive reinforcement with electroencephalography (EEG) feedback. Electrodes are placed on specific brain areas, guiding patients to regulate their brainwave activity. 

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses electromagnetism to induce an electric field by passing a magnetic field through the scalp. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on the other hand, directly applies an electric current through the scalp. Both repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and tDCS primarily target the outermost layers of neurons, as they are non-invasive methods. Nevertheless, both techniques are believed to affect deeper layers through interconnected neuronal networks.  

The Study:

A French research team conducted a systematic search of the peer-reviewed medical literature to perform a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of these experimental treatment techniques. 

Eight studies – four using rTMS and another four using tDCS – met the inclusion criteria. Studies had to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and had to involve multiple sessions of treatment. Participants had to be adults previously diagnosed with ADHD.  

Outcomes were measured through self-rated scales, neuropsychological tests, and electrophysiological pre-post evaluations. 

Separate meta-analyses of the four tDCS RCTs combining 154 participants and of the four rTMS RCTs encompassing 149 participants likewise reported no significant improvements. In all cases variation in outcomes between studies was moderate, and there were no signs of publication bias. 

The Conclusion on Neuromechanistic Treatments for ADHD:

Meta-analysis of all eight studies with a combined total of 421 participants reported no significant improvements over controls. Narrowing down to studies that used sham controls likewise produced no significant improvements. So, despite the title of this study, these neuromechanistic treatments do not appear to be the future of treatment for adult ADHD.

‍

According to the World Health Organization, suicide is the second leading cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 29 years. 

A European study team recently released findings of the first meta-analysis to explore the association between clinically diagnosed ADHD in children and adolescents and subsequent suicidality.  

The criteria for study inclusion were: 

• Most participants had to be under 18 at baseline. 

• Longitudinal design, meaning that participants were followed over time. 

• Having an ADHD sample diagnosed in childhood that was followed up for suicidal behavior. 

• Having a control group without ADHD that was followed up for suicidal behavior. 

• That ADHD was clinically diagnosed based on DSM-5 criteria. 

• The total number of participants and of those with suicidal behavior in both the ADHD group and the control group during follow-up were reported. 

All selected studies scored at least eight out of 11 points after quality assessment. The most frequent defect was that it was unclear whether suicidal behavior had occurred before study initiation. 

Meta-analysis of all nine included studies, encompassing more than 4.4 million participants, reported more than threefold greater odds of overall suicidal behavior among children and adolescents previously diagnosed with ADHD, as opposed to children and adolescents not previously diagnosed with ADHD. Study outcomes varied significantly (high heterogeneity) but showed no publication bias. 

Breaking this down into subcategories of risk: 

• Two studies combining 521 participants reported roughly fourfold greater odds of suicidal ideation among those previously diagnosed with ADHD, with negligible heterogeneity. 

• Six studies encompassing a total of more than 87,000 children and adolescents reported more than threefold greater odds of suicide attempt among those previously diagnosed with ADHD, with high heterogeneity. 

• Two studies combining more than 2.6 million participants reported a near-quadrupling of the odds of suicide death among those previously diagnosed with ADHD, with negligible heterogeneity. 

‍

The team concluded, “the current systematic review and meta-analysis has confirmed previous findings that there is an elevated risk for suicidal behavior in ADHD patients.” They also note, however, that “this relationship is heterogeneous and complex, with significant differences across ADHD subtypes, age groups, sexes, comorbidities, and social issues, all of which play important roles in the development of suicidal behavior.”

‍

The Newest Non-stimulant Medication for ADHD

Centanafadine, which is currently under investigation as a treatment for ADHD, will be the first triple reuptake inhibitor for the disorder if it is approved by the FDA. It improves norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin levels. This new medication is not a stimulant, but due to the dopamine component, it has a stimulant-like effect in patients. In adults, two phase 3 trials and a year-long extension have shown sustained benefits and a tolerable safety profile, laying the groundwork for pediatric research.

Based on this study, improvement was already noticeable after the first week and held steady through week 6. The lower dose (164.4 mg) didn’t separate from placebo, reminding us that getting the dose right will be critical. The effect size was smaller than what is seen for stimulants but 50% of patients had excellent outcomes as indicated by reductions in the ADHD-RS of 50% or more.

Side effect patterns look familiar to anyone who prescribes ADHD medications; loss of appetite, nausea and headaches topped the list. About half of teens on the higher dose reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, compared with a quarter of those on placebo. Severe reactions were rare but did include isolated liver enzyme spikes, rash, and a few reports of aggression or somnolence. For everyday practice, that translates to routine growth checks, a look at baseline liver function, and clear guidance to families about reporting rashes or mood changes promptly.

The researchers noted that the study had certain limitations, including limited generalizability to adolescents beyond North America, the exclusion of teacher ratings on the ADHD-RS-5 scale and the study’s short duration. They added that future studies should explore long-term treatment outcomes and efficacy compared with other ADHD treatments, as well as its effect on treating ADHD with comorbid conditions.

Why should this matter to clinicians already juggling multiple non-stimulant options for ADHD?

First, speed. Centanafadine separated from placebo within a week. In this regard, it might be closer to stimulants than to the multi-week ramp-up we expect from current non-stimulants. Second, it offers another option when stimulants are contraindicated or poorly tolerated, or when they raise diversion concerns. Its mechanism also makes it intriguing for patients who need both norepinephrine and dopamine coverage but prefer to avoid schedule II drugs. Because it also improves serotonergic transmission, it may be useful for some of ADHD’s comorbidities (see our new article for evidence about serotonin’s role in these disorders).

Keep in mind that centanafadine for ADHD is still investigational, so participation in clinical trials remains the only access route.

‍

A recent in-depth clinical review published by the American Academy of Neurology examines how ADHD manifests in adulthood and how neurologists can differentiate it from other causes of attention problems. 

Recognition of ADHD in adults by clinicians is often delayed or misdiagnosed due to overlapping symptoms with anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and life stressors. Conversely, as ADHD in adults becomes more widely acknowledged, largely due to increased public awareness and social media trends, clinicians need to take extra care not to incorrectly diagnose patients with ADHD. This publication aims to shine a light on both sides of this issue and highlight the importance of clinicians being trained in proper ADHD screening. 

ADHD Symptom Overlaps and Differential Diagnosis 

The article highlights how many adults come to neurology clinics convinced they have ADHD after online quizzes or watching others get diagnosed. True ADHD must be differentiated from issues with shared signs and symptoms such as poor sleep, anxiety, depression, or even OCD or Bipolar Disorder. This is a high-level clinical skill called differential diagnosis.

• Sleep Issues- This is one of the most common causes of attention and focus problems that resemble ADHD in adults. Chronic sleep deprivation can lead to issues like distractibility, forgetfulness, and emotional instability, which may be mistaken for ADHD symptoms, especially if people don’t realize how long-term sleep loss has affected them. Clinicians are encouraged to ask about sleep habits and use tools like the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

‍

• Anxiety Disorders- Anxiety is common in adults with ADHD, but a patient with anxiety who does not have ADHD may present with signs and symptoms that overlap with ADHD. A key difference between anxiety and ADHD is that people with ADHD often get distracted even when relaxed or doing something enjoyable without realizing it. Those with anxiety usually feel tense, guilty, and very aware of their distraction.

‍

• Depression- Depression can cause trouble with focus, energy, and motivation, again, often overlapping with or mimicking symptoms of ADHD. Since both conditions are common, they can also occur together, making it important to look at when symptoms started. If attention problems were present before any depressive episodes, it may point to ADHD, but in unclear cases, treating depression first and then reassessing can help clarify the diagnosis.

‍

• OCD- Some people with ADHD experience distressing, repetitive thoughts that feel like OCD, even if they haven’t been diagnosed with it. These thoughts can cause anxiety or sadness, even when the person knows they’re unlikely or irrational, but unlike OCD, there are no compulsive behaviors. In some cases, ADHD medication helps reduce these thoughts by improving focus and emotional regulation.

‍

• Autism- Adults with ASD are more likely to also have ADHD, and in some cases, ADHD symptoms, such as missing social cues or acting impulsively, can be mistaken for autism. This overlap can sometimes make diagnosis more complicated.

The author of the article, Dr. Mierau, provides detailed clinical strategies such as asking open-ended questions, exploring how symptoms show up at home and at work, and watching for patterns like chronic lateness or emotional overeating. (This paper points out that, while not included in the DSM-VI, food cravings and binge behaviors are commonly found in patients with ADHD.)

This review correctly emphasizes that neuropsychological testing is not necessary for diagnosis. Instead, a thorough clinical interview, including a detailed family history and behavioral observation, can be more telling. 

Conclusion: Real Barriers to Proper ADHD Diagnosis

The review article closes with a call to action: the biggest obstacle isn’t diagnosing or treating ADHD, it’s access. Adults struggle with pharmacy shortages, no-refill laws, and insurance hurdles, despite research showing treatment reduces mortality and improves life quality. Dr. Mierau argues for more trained providers, better public education, and policy changes to reduce stigma and expand access.

‍

New research has uncovered important links between certain blood metabolites and ADHD by using a genetic method called Mendelian randomization. This approach leverages natural genetic differences to help identify which metabolites might actually cause changes in ADHD risk, offering stronger clues than traditional observational studies.

Key Metabolic Pathways Involved:

The study found 42 plasma metabolites with a causal relationship to ADHD. Most fall into two major groups:

• Amino acid metabolites from protein metabolism, including those related to tyrosine, methionine, cysteine, and taurine.
  
  
• Fatty acids, especially long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) like DHA and EPA, important for brain function.
  
  

What Does This Mean for Diet and ADHD?

Since many metabolites come from dietary sources like proteins and fats this supports the idea that diet could influence metabolic pathways involved in ADHD. However, because the study focused on genetic influences on metabolite levels, it doesn’t directly prove that dietary changes will have the same effects.

Notable Metabolites:

• 3-Methoxytyramine sulfate (MTS): linked to dopamine metabolism, higher genetic levels of MTS were associated with a lower risk of ADHD. Dopamine plays a crucial role in attention and behavior.
  
  
• DHA and EPA: Omega-3 fatty acids abundant in the brain; higher levels were linked to reduced ADHD risk, supporting existing research on omega-3 supplements.
  
  
• N-acetylneuraminate: Involved in brain development and immune function, with higher levels linked to increased ADHD risk, though more research is needed to understand this.
  
  

Five metabolites showed bidirectional links with ADHD, meaning genetic risk for ADHD also affects their levels which suggests a complex interaction between brain function and metabolism.

Twelve ADHD-related metabolites are targets of existing drugs or supplements, including:

• Acetylcysteine: an antioxidant used in various treatments.
  
  
• DHA supplements: widely used to support brain and heart health.
  
  

What This Study Doesn’t Show

While these findings highlight biological pathways, they don’t prove that changing diet will directly alter ADHD symptoms. Metabolite levels are shaped by genetics plus environment, lifestyle, and health factors, which require further study.

Conclusion: 

This research provides stronger evidence of metabolic pathways involved in ADHD and points to new possibilities for diagnosis and treatment. Future work could explore how diet or drugs might safely adjust these metabolites to help manage ADHD.

While this study strengthens the link between amino acid and fatty acid metabolism and ADHD risk, suggesting that diet could play a role, ultimately more research is still needed before experts could use this research to give specific nutritional advice.

‍

Background Info:

Executive functions include inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress distractions and focus on goals, which is the main deficit in ADHD. 

Children and adolescents with ADHD often have off-task, unrelated thoughts and are easily distracted, limiting their sustained attention. This makes it difficult for them to focus on tasks and leads to impulsive behaviors that affect their daily life, academics, and social interactions. Improving inhibitory control in ADHD children and adolescents is essential. 

Stimulant medications are commonly used to treat ADHD. However, side effects like insomnia, loss of appetite, and headaches may make parents hesitant to use these medications for their children. 

Non-pharmacological treatments like cognitive training, behavior therapy, and physical exercise have gained attention for their lack of side effects. Research shows that some non-pharmacological methods can improve cognitive outcomes significantly, underscoring their potential in treating ADHD. 

Study:

A Chinese research team identified four key gaps in current research on non-pharmacological treatments for inhibitory control in children with ADHD: 

• Existing meta-analyses seldom differentiate between short-term and long-term interventions.  

• Most studies focus primarily on short-term effects and neglect evaluation of maintenance effects through follow-up assessments.  

• New treatment methods, such as meditation and board games, have not been systematically assessed in meta-analyses for their impact on inhibitory control in children and adolescents with ADHD, leaving their effectiveness uncertain.  

• Traditional meta-analysis does not tell us which intervention is most effective. Without this comparative analysis, it is difficult to rank efficacy. 

The team therefore performed a network meta-analysis of long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess and rank the effectiveness of various non-pharmacological treatments on inhibitory control in children and adolescents with ADHD. 

The team included only RCTs relying on professional diagnoses of ADHD, excluding those based only on parent and teacher rating scales.  

The included studies measured inhibitory control using objective neurocognitive tasks, such as the Stroop test and the Go/No-Go test, to reduce potential subjective bias. Studies relying on parent- or teacher-reported questionnaires were excluded. 

Controls either received no intervention or placebo, such as watching running videos and attending history classes. 

Meta-analysis of 16 studies combining 546 participants found large short-term effect size improvements in inhibitory control from physical exercise. But the two studies with a total of 110 participants that performed a follow-up test reported only a small-to-medium effect size improvement. 

For cognitive training, a meta-analysis of fifteen studies totaling 674 participants reported a medium effect size of short-term improvement in inhibitory control. The ten studies with 563 participants that performed a follow-up test found only a small effect size improvement since treatment initiation. 

For behavioral therapy, meta-analysis of six studies encompassing 244 individuals likewise found a medium effect size short-term improvement in inhibitory control. In this case, however two studies combining 91 participants that performed a follow-up test reported that the medium effect size improvement was maintained. 

For neurofeedback, meta-analysis of seven studies encompassing 186 individuals found a small-to-medium effect size short-term improvement in inhibitory control. The only study that performed a follow-up test reported a small effect size improvement since treatment initiation. 

The two studies with a combined 44 individuals exploring board games found no significant improvement in inhibitory control. Likewise, the two studies combining 32 participants that explored meditation found no significant improvement in inhibitory control. 

There was no indication of publication bias. 

Conclusion:

The team concluded, “Existing evidence shows that physical exercise, behavior therapy, cognitive training, and neurofeedback can effectively improve the inhibitory control of children and adolescents with ADHD. However, meditation, EMG feedback, and board games did not significantly affect inhibitory control. Physical exercise has the best effect among all non-pharmacological treatments, but its impact will be weakened after intervention. Behavior therapy and cognitive training had a slightly lower effect, but they have a better maintenance effect.” 

Ultimately, the study results suggest that non-drug treatments can help children and teens with ADHD improve their ability to control their actions and stay focused. Some methods, like physical exercise, work well at first but may fade once the activity stops. Other methods, like behavioral therapy and cognitive training, may take a little longer to show results but can last longer and make a bigger difference over time. Ultimately, and most importantly, because this work did not study the symptoms of ADHD or its real-world impairments, it provides no reason to change current treatment practices for ADHD.

‍

‍

Serotonin is a key chemical in the body that helps regulate mood, behavior, and also many physical functions such as sleep and digestion. It has also been linked to how ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) develops in the brain. This study looks at how serotonin may be involved in both the mental health and physical health conditions that often occur alongside ADHD.

It is well-established that ADHD is more than just trouble focusing or staying still. For many, it brings along a host of other physical and mental health challenges. It is very common for those with ADHD to also have other diagnosed disorders. For example, those with ADHD are often also diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or sleep disorders. When these issues overlap, they are called comorbidities. 

A new comprehensive review, led by Dr. Stephen V. Faraone and colleagues, delves into how serotonin (5-HT), a major brain chemical, may be at the heart of many of these common comorbidities.

Wait! I thought ADHD had to do with Dopamine–Why are we looking at Serotonin?

Serotonin is a neurotransmitter most often linked to mood, but its role in regulating the body has much broader implications. It regulates sleep, digestion, metabolism, hormonal balance, and even immune responses. Although ADHD has long been associated with dopamine and norepinephrine dysregulation, this review suggests that serotonin also plays a central role, especially when it comes to comorbid conditions.

The Study:

• Objective: To systematically review which conditions commonly co-occur with ADHD and determine whether serotonin dysfunction might be a common thread linking them.
  
  
• Method: The authors combed through existing literature up to March 2024, analyzing evidence for serotonin involvement in each comorbidity associated with ADHD.
  
  
• Scope: 182 psychiatric and somatic conditions were found to frequently occur in people with ADHD.
  
  

Key Findings

• 74% of Comorbidities Linked to Serotonin: Of the 182 comorbidities identified, 135 showed evidence of serotonergic involvement—91 psychiatric and 44 somatic (physical) conditions.
  
  
• Psychiatric Comorbidities: These include anxiety disorders, depression, bipolar disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder—all of which have long-standing associations with serotoninergic dysfunction.
  
  
• Somatic Comorbidities: Conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), migraines, and certain sleep disorders also showed a significant serotonergic link.
  
  

This research suggests that serotonin dysregulation could explain the diverse and sometimes puzzling range of symptoms seen in ADHD patients. It supports a more integrative model of ADHD—one that goes beyond the brain’s attention, reward and executive control circuits and considers broader physiological and psychological health.

future research into the role of serotonin could help develop more tailored interventions, especially for patients who don't respond well to stimulant medications. Future studies may focus on serotonin’s role in early ADHD development and how it interacts with environmental and genetic factors.

The Take-Away: 

This study is a strong reminder that ADHD is a complex, multifaceted condition. Differential diagnosis is crucial to properly diagnosing and treating ADHD. Clinicians' understanding of the underlying link between ADHD and its common comorbidities may help future ADHD patients receive the individualized care they need. By shedding light on serotonin’s wide-reaching influence, this study may provide a valuable roadmap for improving how we diagnose and treat those with complex comorbidities in the future. 

‍

Our recent study, published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, aims to shed light on an under-recognized challenge faced by many adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D): attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms.

We surveyed over 2,000 adults with T1D using the Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) for ADHD and analyzed their medical records. Of those who responded, nearly one-third met the criteria for ADHD symptoms—far higher than the general population average. Notably, only about 15% had a formal diagnosis or were receiving treatment.

The findings are striking: individuals with higher ADHD symptom scores had significantly worse blood sugar control, as indicated by higher HbA1c levels. Those flagged as "ASRS positive" were more than twice as likely to have poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 8.0%). They also reported higher levels of depressive symptoms.

As expected, ADHD symptoms decreased with age but remained more common than in the general public. No strong links were found between ADHD symptoms and other cardiometabolic issues.

This study highlights a previously overlooked yet highly significant factor in diabetes management. ADHD-related difficulties—such as forgetfulness, inattention, or impulsivity—can make managing a complex condition like T1D more difficult. The researchers call for more screening and awareness of ADHD in adults with diabetes, which could lead to better mental health and improved blood sugar outcomes.

Takeaway: If you or a loved one with T1D struggles with focus, organization, or consistent self-care, it may be worth exploring whether ADHD could be part of the picture. Early identification and support are crucial to managing this common comorbidity. 

‍

Background:

This nationwide population study by a Norwegian team aimed to evaluate the relationship between ADHD and various types of child welfare services contacts over a long-term period of up to 18 years among children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years diagnosed with ADHD, in comparison to the general population within the same age group. 

Norway has a single-payer national health insurance system that fully covers virtually the entirety of its population. In combination with a system of national population and health registers, this facilitates nationwide population studies, overcoming the limitations of relying on population sampling. 

Study:

The study population included all 8,051 children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 who were diagnosed with ADHD for the first time in the Norwegian Patient Registry between 2009 and 2011. 

The study also included a comparison sample of 75,184 children and adolescents aged 5–18 with no child welfare services contact during 2009–2011. 

The interventions delivered by child welfare services in Norway are largely divided into two primary categories: supportive intervention and out-of-home placement. 

Supportive interventions include improving parenting skills, promoting child development, providing supervision and control, facilitating cooperation with other services, assessments and treatments by other institutions, and offering housing support. 

Norway uses foster homes or child welfare institutions as a last resort. When supportive interventions fail to meet the child’s needs, the child welfare services can temporarily place the child in these facilities. If parents disagree, the county social welfare board decides based on a municipal request. 

The team adjusted for potential confounders: sex, age, parental socioeconomic status (father’s and mother’s education and income level), and marital status. 

Results:

With these adjustments, children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD were over six times more likely to have any contact with child welfare services than their general population peers. This was equally true for males and females.  

Children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD were also over six times more likely to receive supportive interventions from child welfare services. Again, there were no differences between males and females. 

Finally, children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD were roughly seven times more likely to have an out-of-home placement than their general population peers. For males this rose to eight times more likely. 

Conclusion:

The team concluded, “This population-based study provides robust evidence of a higher rate and strong association between ADHD and contact with CWS [Child Welfare Service] compared to the general population in Norway.” 

‍